Skip to content

Update authors/contributors spec #90

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 23, 2021
Merged

Conversation

ErikSchierboom
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@ErikSchierboom ErikSchierboom requested a review from iHiD March 23, 2021 12:10
}
],
"contributors": ["PythonPerfection"],
"authors": ["PythonProfessor"],
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we change this second example so it's more visibly different to the first pls?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Something like this (pushed change)?

@ErikSchierboom ErikSchierboom merged commit 8ee19e7 into main Mar 23, 2021
@ErikSchierboom ErikSchierboom deleted the flatten-authors-contributors branch March 23, 2021 14:24
- The `"contributors[].exercism_username"` key is optional
- The `"contributors[].exercism_username"` key must be a non-empty, non-blank string
- The `"contributors[].exercism_username"` value is treated case-insensitively
- The `"contributors"` value must be a non-empty array
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requiring that contributors is non-empty is a new requirement in this PR, and it's not obvious that this was intended.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And it should not have been. This is wrong.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants